Subject:
|
Re: New angled beam
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Sep 1999 15:55:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
657 times
|
| |
|
|
"Eric Brok" <brok@fcjsvc.hvu.nl> writes:
> > http://www.math.uio.no/~fredrigl/technic/ldraw/32140.gif
>
> That's not the one that was meant in R2-D2, if i'm right.
No, it isn't. It is the one Huw Millington talked about in the post I
followed up on. Let me review: It's the new "liftarm" part which was
introduced earlier this year in the connectables set.
> That one's not 45 degrees.
Of course it isn't. It's 90°, as Huw Millington said in the post I
followed up on.
Or was it something else you wanted to comment? Your post seemed very
out of place to me, so I may have missed something.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New angled beam
|
| Fredrik Glöckner wrote in message ... (...) Sorry. i meant to say that the R2-D2 piece Fredrik originally meant was not *90* degrees, but about 45 degrees. It's not the liftarm but a one-bend beam, shorter version than before. Meanwhile this also (...) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
