Subject:
|
Re: New angled beam
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:59:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
913 times
|
| |
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message
news:m33dvyhu3r.fsf@sade.uio.no...
> "Eric Brok" <brok@fcjsvc.hvu.nl> writes:
> It's not 45° or even 135° (as you probably meant). Rather, it has the
> same angle as the original one bend beam (6629), that is 143.13°. This
> is according to Huw Millington, who has the part in questions himself.
>
> > It's not the liftarm but a one-bend beam, shorter version than
> > before.
>
> In LDraw, we call these parts "liftarms". Anyway, the new part is not
> shorter than before, it has indeed the same total length and the same
> number of holes as the old one. But the bend is one hole closer to the
> shorted end. This is also according to Huw Millington.
I will post a scan of the piece in question later to settle this once and
for all :-)
Huw
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New angled beam
|
| (...) It's not 45° or even 135° (as you probably meant). Rather, it has the same angle as the original one bend beam (6629), that is 143.13°. This is according to Huw Millington, who has the part in questions himself. (...) In LDraw, we call these (...) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
