Subject:
|
Re: Feedback (Was Re: There can be only one)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:04:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1063 times
|
| |
|
|
> > As have I. The reason I do not post my MOCs is not because they are CAD or
> > microfig, but because it is a waste of time to post. I know I'll get maybe
> > one or two replies, so therefore I don't waste my time. I {have} proven
> > this.
>
>
> All you've proven is that you give up too easily. Looking back on your
> posts to
> space, you just haven't posted that many MOCs. If you want praise, you have to
> really impress. If you want constructive criticism, you have to ask for it
> {repeatedly}. A lot of people tend to post when impressed rather than when
> they
> think they can help your building along. That's the way it is. So you have to
> find other ways to improve your building, like research and study other MOCs,
> experiment with unusual parts, that sort of thing. It's not an easy road
> to fame
> and recognition in {any} field really, why should it be any different here?
> Consider Rick Hallman. For ages, he posted MOCs and got so little feedback but
> he kept on posting MOCs, listening for feedback, improving his building, and
> slowly his feeback increased so by now he's quite an accomplished builder. And
> all because he {persevered}.
You have a good point here Paul. you have to make people sit up and take
notice. and perseverance is the best way and whining tends not to do that.
> > > Maybe I'm wrong, Maybe there is no hierarchy, but it seems that little
> > > accomplishments by these 'old dudes' make more headlines then huge
> > > accomplishments by unknown dudes, like myself.
>
>
> Actually, I make a point of not posting feedback for {any} MOC, newbie or
> old-timer, unless I think I have some specific point to make. Often I want to
> bring attention to certain details, but I generally like giving constructive
> (positive) criticism. Why, just in the last few weeks I've given constructive
> criticism to several old-timers and newbies alike, even Messrs. Sandlin and
> Giddens. Even them!
I have to say Paul, that at Brickmeet last weekend, even though I only
brought one MOC along the response I got really meant a lot to me. Since
you were one of those who commented on it I thought I would mention it.
But feedback is really about one thing, and one thing only. Other people's
points of view. I like to geed feedback so I can see how other people
think and build. use those ideas in my own building
Paul and Zac have been big influences on my building of late, but that is
because they have commented on my stuff. (but when you are in the same room
as a MOC it is easier to comment)
> While I agree that there's an "in-crowd" element to the former that can be a
> little alienating, I disagree on the latter. I think "Real great ships"
> get good
> recognition here regardless of the builder. Of course, if you have a good
> example that I may be overlooking then feel free to point it out.
It is the nature of communities. but good examples speak for themselves
> We're all friendly here, it's just that we're also striving (to some
> extent) to
> keep the forum as interesting reading as possible. Sometimes I think the two
> compromise each other somewhat.
you cannot please all the people all the time
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/pbaulch/Icons/scifisig.jpg
Just a note Paul, Love this ship. but I agree that the boat hull sections
may be a little out of place. If you want to expand it sideways how about
a second set of engines to give it that hugely overpowered look.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: There can be only one
|
| -snip- (...) As have I. The reason I do not post my MOCs is not because they are CAD or microfig, but because it is a waste of time to post. I know I'll get maybe one or two replies, so therefore I don't waste my time. I have proven this. (...) I (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
