Subject:
|
Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Jan 1999 23:18:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1570 times
|
| |
|
|
While talking about separating the battery pack from the RCX it occurred to
me that having the thing forget all the firmware whenever you change the
batteries is a *pain*.
Making the RCX retain this in a semi-permanent or permanent fashion would be
nice.
Is it now possible to obtain a 9 Volt version of those small 0.5 or 1 Farad
capacitors that would be small enough to fit in the RCX rev 2.0 ? If you
replaced 1 battery at a time or did not leave them all out too long
something like this would suffice to keep the memory alive.
Would flash memory (like that of the SSFDC cards) be fast enough to execute
from ? You can get 16 Meg now for $50. The 2 Meg size should be cheaper than
a 2X4 standard brick. :-)
I think I will go look up the cycle times and such on the web. This would be
way cool to have an RCX with pluggable (and expandable) memory cards...
--
SeeYa !
------------
Jim
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
From the keyboard of Cyberia - (the machine's name, not mine)
Pete Hardie <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message
news:3690F4FF.DFD3B19B@dvsg.sciatl.com...
> Jakob Nebeker wrote:
> >
> > Here are some things I would like to see changed for RCX 2. (if there
> > is even one)
> >
> > 1. More connections. At least 4 outputs and 4 inputs. The way it is
> > right now, a robot that drives around can't really do much else, given
> > that there is only one output to spare for a light or a motor. Another
> > inut would also be nice, but not as badly needed as the output.
>
> More inputs, certainly. Lots more. Outputs could do with fewer
> additional,
> since there is less 'critical' need for more motions.
>
> >
> > 2. Smaller size. The RCX 1.0 is HUGE!. A small robot with RCX 1.0 is
> > just impossible, the thing is so dang big. I would like to see the next
> > version half as thick and with a top 2/3 the size. This would allow for
> > some really neat, small robots.
>
> I like someone's idea of a separate battery box, so you can split the
> load.
>
> --
> Pete Hardie | Goalie, DVSG Dart Team
> Scientific Atlanta |
> Digital Video Services Group |
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas.
|
| (...) I have been able to change batteries without losing firmware or programs. Just line the new batteries up in the correct orientation, flip all the old ones out (it helps to have the +ve end such that your thumb goes to the larger gap there) and (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas.
|
| (...) More inputs, certainly. Lots more. Outputs could do with fewer additional, since there is less 'critical' need for more motions. (...) I like someone's idea of a separate battery box, so you can split the load. (26 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
