Subject:
|
Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Jan 1999 05:39:52 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
brett@sr.hp.com*saynotospam*
|
Viewed:
|
1343 times
|
| |
|
|
Laurentino Martins wrote:
> You forget that there are many of us (if not the majority) that neither have the means to build hardware, nor have the knowledge or know-how to build it.
I'll agree that many people don't have ready access to a soldering iron,
but the concepts are pretty simple and the plans for such "extensions"
to the RCX are available on the web.
I'm a software-type. Odds are 50/50 that I'll burn myself with a
soldering iron. But simple projects like these (and they are simple
given that someone else has figured out all the resistor values and
everything) are a lot of fun for me to work on (once the bandages come
off from the previous project :-)
--
Brett Carver
brett@sr.hp.com
(707) 577-4344
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas.
|
| (...) You forget that there are many of us (if not the majority) that neither have the means to build hardware, nor have the knowledge or know-how to build it. I personally know how good I am at destroying hardware. Is not uncommon to try to fix (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
