Subject:
|
Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:28:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3223 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In article lugnet.publish, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
> > Mike Faunce <mfaunce@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > At 70%, there is visible degradation, but at 95%, you get a 50% space
> > > savings and the degradation is not that noticeable. I don't know about • the
> > > rest of you, but my hard drive and ISP both place restrictions on the • amount
> > > of data I can store, so does my wallet, so using that space to my • advantage
> > > is a must.
> >
> > jpg is fine if you're satisfied with the image. But if you plan on
> > editing the image you'll need to remember that if you keep saving it
> > at 95% then it is shoved through that lossy process every single time.
>
> It depends on the imaging application and how much of the image you tweak.
> For example, if you go in and remove a spot with Adobe Photoshop, it's • smart
> enough only to alter that part of the image. (So I've heard.)
That's been my experience, I've not noticed any "increasing" degradation
after editing a picture several times.
-----
Mike Faunce - mfaunce@earthlink.net
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
63 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
