To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 310
309  |  311
Subject: 
Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 16:47:58 GMT
Viewed: 
1236 times
  
In article lugnet.publish, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
Mike Faunce <mfaunce@earthlink.net> wrote:
At 70%, there is visible degradation, but at 95%, you get a 50% space
savings and the degradation is not that noticeable.  I don't know about the
rest of you, but my hard drive and ISP both place restrictions on the amount
of data I can store, so does my wallet, so using that space to my advantage
is a must.

jpg is fine if you're satisfied with the image.  But if you plan on
editing the image you'll need to remember that if you keep saving it
at 95% then it is shoved through that lossy process every single time.

It depends on the imaging application and how much of the image you tweak.
For example, if you go in and remove a spot with Adobe Photoshop, it's smart
enough only to alter that part of the image.  (So I've heard.)

--Todd



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
 
(...) amount (...) Yup. It also has a good range of filters to improve an image. Of course, Photoshop, like most applications has to be set to always save at 100% to avoid image degradation in a jpg. Photoshop does a pretty good job of compensating (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
  Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
 
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) the (...) amount (...) advantage (...) smart (...) That's been my experience, I've not noticed any "increasing" degradation after editing a picture several times. ----- Mike Faunce - mfaunce@earthlink.net (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
 
(...) jpg is fine if you're satisfied with the image. But if you plan on editing the image you'll need to remember that if you keep saving it at 95% then it is shoved through that lossy process every single time. (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)

63 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR