To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 311
310  |  312
Subject: 
Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 16:30:25 GMT
Viewed: 
3302 times
  
Todd Lehman writes:
> In article lugnet.publish, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
> > Mike Faunce <mfaunce@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > At 70%, there is visible degradation, but at 95%, you get a 50% space
> > > savings and the degradation is not that noticeable.  I don't know about the
> > > rest of you, but my hard drive and ISP both place restrictions on the • amount
> > > of data I can store, so does my wallet, so using that space to my advantage
> > > is a must.
> > 
> > jpg is fine if you're satisfied with the image.  But if you plan on
> > editing the image you'll need to remember that if you keep saving it
> > at 95% then it is shoved through that lossy process every single time.
> 
> It depends on the imaging application and how much of the image you tweak.
> For example, if you go in and remove a spot with Adobe Photoshop, it's smart
> enough only to alter that part of the image.  (So I've heard.)

Yup.  It also has a good range of filters to improve an image.  Of course,
Photoshop, like most applications has to be set to always save at 100% to avoid
image degradation in a jpg.  Photoshop does a pretty good job of compensating
for my lousy camera technique :)

BTW, I tried to find out what the settings were on the 81 last night, but my
wife had fled with the camera 'ere I eve approached the house.  She takes that
thing everywhere...  Also, the instructions weren't much help, they only come
in German and French (?!?!?) My French isn't that great, but I did figure out
that it will take a single shot of bmp per disk, at 640x480.  no indication of
color depth, though.

One thing I did notice, although I haven't played with it, so I don't know if
it makes a difference or if it's just a salesman tool, is that the camera grabs
the whole image in a single pass, not multiple scans.  Sony says this makes for
a sharper image, but again, I haven't played with it yet.  (hmm, maybe I'll
sneak it off to work someday...)

James



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
 
(...) It depends on the imaging application and how much of the image you tweak. For example, if you go in and remove a spot with Adobe Photoshop, it's smart enough only to alter that part of the image. (So I've heard.) --Todd (28 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)

63 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR