To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 305
304  |  306
Subject: 
Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 22:22:23 GMT
Reply-To: 
cjc@#spamless#newsguy.com
Viewed: 
1117 times
  
Mike Faunce <mfaunce@earthlink.net> wrote:
I got a Kodak Advantix Film Drive (FD-300) for my computer.  Advantix film
"stays" in the roll (unlike 35mm where you get the negatives back but no
roll).  You stick the roll of processed film into the drive and can scan and
manipulate at your leisure.  It's got 3 resolutions 875x500, 1750x1000 and
2625x150, scans at 2400 dpi (optically).  The driver software scans images
as .bmp's, which I immediately convert to .jpg for about a 5-70% space
savings.  My only complaint I have is that you can't "automatically" scan an
entire roll, you've got to do it one picture at a time.  It handles all
three formats (Classic, HDTV and Panoramic) that Advantix cameras support.

Aside from the pain of scanning each one individually, how is the
speed on each scan?  I would hope this would be a SCSI device, but
something tells me with the trend towards parallel stuff it might not
be.

I have an HP Photosmart scanner for 35mm negatives and slides (also
does 5x7 prints but I have a flatbed for that.  Wish I could use it
now, but I lost the CD somewhere in the Lego room a couple of months
ago and it was one of the only ones I hadn't backed up.  The
replacement CD HP sent me is corrupt.  :(  I'll find the original
someday, I hope.

--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Focused discussion groups for LEGO fans worldwide



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
 
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) has a (...) though. (...) minute of (...) 1024x768 at 24 bits is over 2.3MB, so none will fit on a floppy. If they use 8 bits or 16 bits, you could fit either one or (you guessed it) none respectively. 800x600 (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)

63 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR