To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 305
304  |  306
Subject: 
Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 22:22:23 GMT
Reply-To: 
cjc@&Spamless&newsguy.com
Viewed: 
2922 times
  
Mike Faunce <mfaunce@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I got a Kodak Advantix Film Drive (FD-300) for my computer.  Advantix film
> "stays" in the roll (unlike 35mm where you get the negatives back but no
> roll).  You stick the roll of processed film into the drive and can scan and
> manipulate at your leisure.  It's got 3 resolutions 875x500, 1750x1000 and
> 2625x150, scans at 2400 dpi (optically).  The driver software scans images
> as .bmp's, which I immediately convert to .jpg for about a 5-70% space
> savings.  My only complaint I have is that you can't "automatically" scan an
> entire roll, you've got to do it one picture at a time.  It handles all
> three formats (Classic, HDTV and Panoramic) that Advantix cameras support.

Aside from the pain of scanning each one individually, how is the
speed on each scan?  I would hope this would be a SCSI device, but
something tells me with the trend towards parallel stuff it might not
be.

I have an HP Photosmart scanner for 35mm negatives and slides (also
does 5x7 prints but I have a flatbed for that.  Wish I could use it
now, but I lost the CD somewhere in the Lego room a couple of months
ago and it was one of the only ones I hadn't backed up.  The
replacement CD HP sent me is corrupt.  :(  I'll find the original
someday, I hope.

--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Focused discussion groups for LEGO fans worldwide



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
 
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) has a (...) though. (...) minute of (...) 1024x768 at 24 bits is over 2.3MB, so none will fit on a floppy. If they use 8 bits or 16 bits, you could fit either one or (you guessed it) none respectively. 800x600 (...) (28 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)

63 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR