Subject:
|
Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 02:46:08 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
(cjc@)stopspam(newsguy.com)
|
Viewed:
|
1540 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Faunce <mfaunce@earthlink.net> wrote:
> At 70%, there is visible degradation, but at 95%, you get a 50% space
> savings and the degradation is not that noticeable. I don't know about the
> rest of you, but my hard drive and ISP both place restrictions on the amount
> of data I can store, so does my wallet, so using that space to my advantage
> is a must.
jpg is fine if you're satisfied with the image. But if you plan on
editing the image you'll need to remember that if you keep saving it
at 95% then it is shoved through that lossy process every single time.
--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Focused discussion groups for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Mavica (was Re: ThrowBots elements are cool)
|
| I don't know if this is common knowledge or not ... I know I found it the hard way: jpeg does not necessarily mean "lossy" compression. You can (with a conversion program, I use Firehand Ember), convert from .xxx to .jpg without loosing information. (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
