To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28404
28403  |  28405
Subject: 
Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:44:24 GMT
Viewed: 
3951 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Chris Phillips wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeff Stembel wrote:
   That section of his post does reveal a lot about his (il)logic processes, though.

Where I come from, it is a sign of critical thinking to be able to evaluate an idea on its own merits, regardless of the source. But I know that critical thinking is a dying art.

Where I come from, critical thinking requires actual thinking, not dogmatic obedience. Sadly, dogmatic obedience is not dying in this country. Citing mythos as fact and expecting to be taken seriously is not critical thinking.

   Do cultural differences add nuance to the written/spoken word that cause different people to react differently to the same phrase? Might this somehow explain why “some people have a problem with the type of language used by others.” Does this mandate that in polite society there are words and phrases that should be avoided?

To the former: yes, of course. That is part of language change. As to those differences *mandating* that there are words and phrases that should be avoided in so-called “polite society,” no. What determines whether or not there are words that should and should not be used is a culture (which can be small or large) and what they find beautiful/ugly or tasteful/distasteful.

   Every generation creates new terminology/slang in order to differentiate themselves from their parents. Why should it be any different between cultures?

Actually, the primary reason isn’t to differentiate themselves from their parents, but rather the language of their parents has been weakened of emphasis by frequent use. This is one of the driving forces of language change. The same is true on a cultural level.

   So I guess I would have to agree with you, Jeff. That section reveals a lot about my logic processes. It’s called “keeping an open mind.”

You’ve shown in this thread that your mind is not, in fact, very open.

Jeff



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
 
(...) Where I come from, it is a sign of critical thinking to be able to evaluate an idea on its own merits, regardless of the source. But I know that critical thinking is a dying art. Do cultural differences add nuance to the written/spoken word (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

61 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR