Subject:
|
Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:40:38 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3163 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim David wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bob Parker wrote:
| |
While not naming any specific sites, I would be interested in hearing the
Community’s thoughts on whether you think it right or wrong for one AFOL
site to talk about another AFOL site. For purposes of this discussion, we
will assume that by talk I mean badmouth.
|
I’m not sure that the sites that prompted your ponderings are really AFOL
sites. Not a a critism of them, merely a thought that the standards of
maturity might not be what you would like to get from an AFOL site
|
Actually, I’ve found the behavior of some people on “adult” LEGO sites (like
Lugnet) to be less mature than the norm on kid-oriented LEGO sites (like
BZPower). There have been incidents and member actions on Lugnet that I
wouldn’t tolerate on BZP.
The standards for maturity don’t always seem to apply to Lugnet.
|
While I can appreciate you point here, Kelly, I have to say that, based on
various comments you’ve made on lugnet in the past, I wouldn’t like to
frequent a site where your ‘standard of maturity’ are applied.
|
Please provide links to my previous applicable comments so I know what you’re
referring to.
Also, let’s define “standard of maturity.” I’d call it “Play Well,” which is
something anybody can do - if they so choose. Not everyone does so choose.
| |
This post is a pretty good example really. Do you consider it mature to make
snide comments about other people’s behaviour?
|
Which snide comments are you referring to? I was making a general statement
based on observed behavior on various LEGO enthusiast web sites, with a specific
(factual) observation that about this particular site. Any perceived snideness
was the result of reader assumptions rather than author intent.
And to short-circuit future accusations, no, I don’t consider myself mature, and
hope I never do. Neener neener.
Kelly
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) I now stand with egg on my face. I had you confused with Mark Pappenfuss. I did a quick scan before posting but wasn't as thorough as I ought to have been. My most sincere apologies for not being more careful and thus casting unfair (...) (17 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) While I can appreciate you point here, Kelly, I have to say that, based on various comments you've made on lugnet in the past, I wouldn't like to frequent a site where your 'standard of maturity' are applied. This post is a pretty good example (...) (17 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
