Subject:
|
Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:15:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2987 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bob Parker wrote:
|
While not naming any specific sites, I would be interested in hearing the
Communitys thoughts on whether you think it right or wrong for one AFOL site
to talk about another AFOL site. For purposes of this discussion, we will
assume that by talk I mean badmouth.
For example, lets say Site A starts threads mentioning that the murfling
on Site Z is out of control and that the mods are too heavy handed. Then
Site Z responds by saying that Site A is just a bunch of loser
poopy-pants who cant make any cool Lego creations. Site A counters with
some name calling and threats of as yet to be determined actions to be taken
in the future against Site Z. The members of Site Z vigorously defend
their beloved site and call for all members of Site A to be banned from
joining Site Z forever. Site A then points out that it was created before
Site Z and that they know more about Lego than anyone else plus who would
want to join Site Z anyways since only posers go there. Site Z hears
about what Site A just said and then within minutes they...
Whew - I need a drink of water.
Is this a large problem in your eyes? If so, are there any steps that could
be taken by anyone that you believe could help the situation?
All thoughts greatly appreciated!
|
I dont see what is wrong with it so long as its not taken to extremes.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| While not naming any specific sites, I would be interested in hearing the Community's thoughts on whether you think it right or wrong for one AFOL site to talk about another AFOL site. For purposes of this discussion, we will assume that by talk I (...) (17 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
61 Messages in This Thread: ![Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Bob Parker (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Richie Dulin (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Didier Enjary (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Eaton (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy P. Smith (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Leonard Hoffman (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Richie Dulin (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Koudys (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Ross Crawford (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Allister McLaren (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Koudys (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Defining censorship -David Eaton (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Defining censorship -Leonard Hoffman (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Defining censorship -David Eaton (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Bible as a literal source? was Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bible as a literal source? was Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bible as a literal source? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bible as a literal source? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Dave Schuler (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Jeff Stembel (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Jeff Stembel (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Eaton (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Eaton (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Dave Schuler (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Matthew Crandall (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Tim David (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Leonard Hoffman (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Leonard Hoffman (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Matthew Crandall (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Eaton (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|