To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28384
28383  |  28385
Subject: 
Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:49:59 GMT
Viewed: 
3700 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Chris Phillips wrote:


<snip>


Fair enough.  But if we're going to start policing spelling and grammatical
errors here on LUGNET then Big Brother is going to be awfully busy...

Ordinarily I wouldn't bother pointing it out but I feel that when someone
decides to be pedantic they really ought to do it properly.

says the man who used the word 'now' where the word 'no' should be...  :)

Yeah I noticed that ;) I also missed out a 'd' on an 'and' in my subsequent
response.

--snip--

Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
 
(...) Not to mention underscores in FTX URLs along the way, and un-matched footnotes ;) Well OK there was only </off-topic/debate/?n=28373 one of each>, I guess I like the occasional hyperbole. Is that Orwellian???? ROSCO (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
 
(...) <snip> (...) says the man who used the word 'now' where the word 'no' should be... :) (...) <snip> (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

61 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR