Subject:
|
Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:05:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3193 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy P. Smith wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
| |
Since “murfling” exists only on ONE site that I’m aware of (since Todd made
up the term), this may not be such a hypothetical example
|
The word has been adopted by the AFOL community (or some of us anyway) and is
used in a more general sense to refer to the actions of admins or other
personnel of any website. It’s a great word, useful and colorful, and more
descriptive than ‘cancelled’ even if that is technically more correct.
Say somebody posts a link to an eBay auction on BrickLink. If they cancel
their own post, that’s canceling. If a Discussion Mod cancels it, that’s
murfling. There’s not necessarily any judgment about ‘right or wrong’, just
about what’s appropriate for a given site. Links to an auction aren’t the
only thing that will get murfled on BL, for example.
Tim “I’ve been murfled” Smith
|
I find it interesting that you describe it this way because murfling was never
meant to be the same as cancelling or deleting a post. The idea is that
questionable posts are visibly separated but still accessible - in essence, a
compromise between the ideal of totally free speech and the practical need for
no cursing on a family site. Somehow murfling got equated with censorship,
which it was never supposed to be (nor is it now).
-Lenny
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) While murfling may not equate to cancelling or deleting a post, I find it hard to comprehend that anyone would not consider it a form of censorship. Though it has not been used widely on LUGNET, and as a result there are few examples of actual (...) (17 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) The word has been adopted by the AFOL community (or some of us anyway) and is used in a more general sense to refer to the actions of admins or other personnel of any website. It's a great word, useful and colorful, and more descriptive than (...) (17 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
