Subject:
|
Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:02:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3643 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Chris Phillips wrote:
<snip>
> >
> > Fair enough. But if we're going to start policing spelling and grammatical
> > errors here on LUGNET then Big Brother is going to be awfully busy...
>
> Ordinarily I wouldn't bother pointing it out but I feel that when someone
> decides to be pedantic they really ought to do it properly.
says the man who used the word 'now' where the word 'no' should be... :)
>
> > > My point is that you clearly missed the point. Richie was in now way
> > > implying that murfling was a part of Big Brother like activities on Lugnet.
> > > He was implying it was a euphemism for censorship. You can argue the
> > > semantics of doublespeak all you like but it doesn't in any way remedy your
> > > original error of comprehension.
<snip>
> Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) And you didn't bother to correct it even while commenting that I hadn't read the book (and doublethink is (URL) most definitely 1984> so I'm wondering if you've read a single book by Orwell). Since your argument seemed to involve arguing that (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
