Subject:
|
Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:58:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3584 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Chris Phillips wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
|
The word murfle was created to describe a form of censorship in fluffy
terms ie. the misleading use of terminology to cloak the true meaning.
Theres nothing new about having an uncensored and a censored version of
things so its not a new word to describe a new action.
|
Is it censorship when a web site makes you click an extra link in order to
see material that may be considered offensive to some?
|
No its not.
|
So how is that different from having to click an extra link to see the
un-murfled version of a message? Do you recognize only shades of grey,
but not shades of pink?
|
All censorship is equal, but some censorship is more equal than others.
|
Cute!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread: ![Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Bob Parker (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Richie Dulin (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Didier Enjary (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Eaton (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy P. Smith (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Leonard Hoffman (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Richie Dulin (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Koudys (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Ross Crawford (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Allister McLaren (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Koudys (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Defining censorship -David Eaton (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Defining censorship -Leonard Hoffman (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Defining censorship -David Eaton (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Bible as a literal source? was Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bible as a literal source? was Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bible as a literal source? -Timothy Gould (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bible as a literal source? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Dave Schuler (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Jeff Stembel (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Chris Phillips (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Jeff Stembel (13-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Eaton (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Eaton (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Dave Schuler (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Matthew Crandall (10-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Tim David (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Leonard Hoffman (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Leonard Hoffman (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Timothy Gould (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Matthew Crandall (12-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -David Eaton (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves? -Kelly McKiernan (11-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|