Subject:
|
Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:19:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3266 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim David wrote:
| |
I’m not sure that the sites that prompted your ponderings are really AFOL
sites. Not a a critism of them, merely a thought that the standards of
maturity might not be what you would like to get from an AFOL site
|
To Kelly’s point, making the observation about the site *members* always will
give you your exceptions. I’m not sure why Kelly chose to specifically
mention Lugnet, but you could just as well have said BZPower, FBTB, JLUG,
Classic-Castle, Classic-Space, or whatever.
|
True, that. All sites have their troublemakers, or those who don’t play well
together.
I mentioned Lugnet because unlike all other sites mentioned, there is no active
moderation here - the only recourse is murfling, which happens rarely and only
as an extreme measure. And also because I don’t know what site(s) actually
brought up the current topic... to me, this is all just theory.
Kelly
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) To Kelly's point, making the observation about the site *members* always will give you your exceptions. I'm not sure why Kelly chose to specifically mention Lugnet, but you could just as well have said BZPower, FBTB, JLUG, Classic-Castle, (...) (18 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
