To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18567
18566  |  18568
Subject: 
the irish times [not the Guardian] & goldwater's "racism".
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:08:09 GMT
Viewed: 
536 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

Some background on Thurmond [From Irish Times]:
http://flag.blackened.net/daver/misc/thurmond.html
==+==
When he was governor of South Carolina in 1948, Thurmond ran for
President on a
"states' rights" (code for "white power") ticket, advocating "segregation of
all the races". In 1964 Thurmond stumped the south for the blatantly racist
presidential campaign of Barry Goldwater (as, of course, did the independent
counsel Kenneth Starr). Ever since, in his deplorably long political career,
Thurmond has continued to appeal to the racial prejudice of an
electorate which
has rewarded him with an eternal place in the Senate.
==+==

Everything I read about this issue tells me that Strom 'renounced' his
segregationalist views, that he became more moderate thru the years.

Times changed and so did Strom.  Lott, on the other hand, still hasn't
clarified what he meant by "All these problems thru all these years" and
that two line apology isn't gonna cut it.

This, as far as I can see, puts the 'moron' quote waaay down the scale of
political slips.

Dave K

I have no love for Lott and certainly not for Thurmond.

I just have one question, where does the "blatantly racist" charge come from
with respect to Goldwater's campaign? I'm wondering if that reveals a
tendency for the Guardian to play loose and fast or whether there's
something else here going on.

Wonder ye not! If you check again carefully, you will see it is quoted from the
"Irish Times" - ie **NOT** The Guardian. What was that about playing loose and
fast? ;)

However, I think the racist tag refers to his alleged support for "states'
rights". I expect many would view that as racist?

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What does a Republican have to do to cause outrage? [was Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian...]
 
(...) I have no love for Lott and certainly not for Thurmond. I just have one question, where does the "blatantly racist" charge come from with respect to Goldwater's campaign? I'm wondering if that reveals a tendency for the Guardian to play loose (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

51 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR