Subject:
|
Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 19:56:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
468 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > Someone, somewhere, in a position of Canadian Authority, told it like it is.
> He may disagree with Bush's decisions handling worldwide terrorism, but
> calling them "moronic" is mere demogoguery.
Why is it that when Limbaugh, Reagan, Gallagher, Buchannan, Falwell,
Robertson, Carlson, Will, O'Reilly et al spout pro-Republican invective it's
called "fair and balanced reporting," but when a left-leaning commentator voices
n opinion it's called demagoguery? Is that the accursed Liberal Media at work
again? Given your love of free speech, I expect that you'd like to have the
Canadian commentator strung up next to Jessica Lange.
> What I'd like to hear are some alternate solutions to deal with terrorism that
> don't include a dependence upon the naive solution of diplomacy (because I've
> seen how well that strategy has worked in the ME)
See? There's a fine example--you decry the (yet to be proven inaccurate)
label of "moronic" as demagoguery, but you're happy to dismiss diplomacy (as
yet untried in the current situtation) as "naive." And your rhetorical point
is weakened still further since you're concluding that, because diplomacy
hasn't worked in one situation, it cannot work in another. And your typical
over-generalizing is once again shining through by your offhand reference to
diplomatic 'failure' "in the ME" as if that region were to be painted with a
single brush.
Bravo to you for your unflappable consistency!
Dave!
By the way--what *would* Jesus drive?
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) Let me also point out what Pat B is saying about Canadians--"Look at all we have done for them and they continue to whine." K, Pat, I'm sitting here waiting for you to list all the great and wondrous things you "'Mericans" have done for us (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) I think you have it backwards, Dave! None of the above would claim to be unbiased-- they are honest and open about their conservative leanings. It's the print media, the networks, public radio who disingenuously pass themselves off as "fair (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) He'd take public transportation, without a doubt. The Apostles would shift for themselves (was that an unintentional anti-automatic transmission joke?). I suppose the more interesting question is what would Satan drive? -->Bruce<-- Who drives (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) I can't help but to wonder if this person's opinion would be different had OBL leveled a different target-- namely Toronto's First Canadian Place. He may disagree with Bush's decisions handling worldwide terrorism, but calling them "moronic" (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
