Subject:
|
Re: Medical Marijuana
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:23:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
821 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> >
> > > The current court has done all
> > > kinds of crazy things with our rights. That the power of the single state
> > > is losing ground to the idea of a single nation in an era of "globalization"
> > > is hardly surprising. Not good, but not surprising...
> >
> > I must confess that this has always puzzled me. Why are "states"
> > preferable to a single state? I can certainly understand how in earlier
> > times the limits of communications and geography necessitated the
> > subdivision of the nation, but this no longer seems relevant to me, and it
> > will only become less meaningful as electronic communication and the web
> > become more advanced. For that matter, why would a global state be a
> > problem? No one here has really discussed it at length (AFAIK), but in the
> > media, the only arguments I hear are horribly xenophobic. Is there a
> > benefit to preventing a one-world community?
>
> Smaller states == smaller tyrannies.
>
> More states == more of a marketplace of ideas.
>
> Do you want a system in which the current population of China and India can
> vote to nuke Scotland???
I want a system where countries do not want to "nuke" others and where
wars are not fought via focus groups and media driven opinion polls.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) It would indeed be nice if a war-less system had *ever* existed. Obviously a world without war is preferable to a world in which war is common, but wars were fought for stupid reasons long before focus groups and media polls existed; there's (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Smaller states == smaller tyrannies. More states == more of a marketplace of ideas. Do you want a system in which the current population of China and India can vote to nuke Scotland??? (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
