To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14835
14834  |  14836
Subject: 
Re: Medical Marijuana
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:10:39 GMT
Viewed: 
719 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
Does your supreme court agree with that view? I hear not.

Depends on the court we are talking about.  The current court has done all
kinds of crazy things with our rights.  That the power of the single state
is losing ground to the idea of a single nation in an era of "globalization"
is hardly surprising.  Not good, but not surprising...

It is sad that the Supreme Court can so completely be used this way, but
there it is. It swings to and fro. We are now in an era of "conservatism" --
or ramrodding all kinds of Republican bilge down the people's throats (to
semi-mix my metaphors).

-- Hop-Frog



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Medical Marijuana
 
But does your constitution not give you supreme court the right to do “all kinds of crazy things” with your rights? By the way, I was talking about this story: US outlaws 'medical' marijuana (URL) A (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Medical Marijuana
 
(...) I must confess that this has always puzzled me. Why are "states" preferable to a single state? I can certainly understand how in earlier times the limits of communications and geography necessitated the subdivision of the nation, but this no (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Medical Marijuana
 
(...) Right. And I take my read on what's constitutional from what the founding fathers *intended*, not from what the current supreme court says about the matter. As I've said before, many times, effectively answering the question posed. As an (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Medical Marijuana
 
(...) Yes. I think it is somebody’s idea of a joke. (...) No. (...) Does your supreme court agree with that view? I hear not. (...) Even if you are correct (I do not intend to check), your initial summary was misleading. Scott A (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

64 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR