Subject:
|
What makes larry think I am too lazy to unsubscribe?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 17:40:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
742 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > Hmm. Your post is amazingly similar to junk mail I received today.
> > >
> > > What junk mail is that?
> > >
> > > Are you getting mail from someone or some organization that you didn't sign
> > > up for,
> >
> > Yes. I think it is somebody’s idea of a joke.
>
> That's regrettable. It wasn't me though, you can be sure of that. You're
> close enough to my idea of a joke as it is without any external assistance
> required.
Youch! An insult.
>
> > > or have tried unsuccessfully to unsubscribe from?
> >
> > No.
>
> So you're too lazy or clueless to unsubscribe, then, but *not* too lazy to
> cluelessy and unjustifiably carp about it?
No.
> If the list is what I think it
> is, it's an opt in list. Therefore it's not junk mail till you actually try
> to unsubscribe and fail in doing so. Till then, you lie by omission in
> calling it junk mail. Please stop.
Its content is mostly junk. I did not sign up for it. It is junk mail. QED.
>
> Thanks for clearing up where your priorities lie, though.
In what way? I have a lot "priorities", I can't think of any which are
directly related to LUGNET.
> Here's another
> example then, of how it's apparently more important to you to have something
> to complain about than it is to actually do something about it. This is an
> endemic behaviour on your part, evidenced by the bickering you start on
> LUGNET just about wherever you turn.
I have said it before, and I will say it again: I've seen you have more
arguments on this forum (I mean the whole of Lugnet) than any other single
person. Refute that if you can.
While we are mulling over your truculence, I also noticed that you *still*
have not apologised to Mladen yet for claiming he was “slagging” Amy(?):
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14536
Scott A
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | how to lie with statistics
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur twists reality thusly: (...) I post a lot. So any metric ought to be on a per post basis. That winnows it down significantly. Else we're saying that Johnny one post gets the nobel peace prize because his one (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Scott's too lazy to unsubscribe
|
| (...) That's regrettable. It wasn't me though, you can be sure of that. You're close enough to my idea of a joke as it is without any external assistance required. (...) So you're too lazy or clueless to unsubscribe, then, but *not* too lazy to (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
