Subject:
|
Re: Lego Holocaust art (Was: can someone help me identify these parts?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jun 1999 03:52:06 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
c576653@cclabs[spamcake].missouri.edu
|
Viewed:
|
691 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Dee wrote:
>
> Pearl Harbour was a military target. Hiroshima and Nagasaki
> were civilian cities. There were sufficient industrial and
> military targets available that would have resulted in
I'm not convinced. I think we basically had to really drive home that
we don't view the world the way they did, and that we were willing to do
anything possible to destroy them. I think we managed that with as
little loss of value as possible.
> Japanese surrender. Granted, what the Japanese did
> throughout Asia was horrendous, and that it was war, but
> that is no justification for incinerating civilian cities.
I think it is.
> And yes, I am fully aware of Dresden, a civilian target,
> targeted by the Royal Air Force, with a similar, if not
> higher, death toll. The only difference was that incendiary
> bombs were used, not atomic. But no less reprehensible.
War is hell.
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
54 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
