To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1235
1234  |  1236
Subject: 
Re: Lego Holocaust art (Was: can someone help me identify these parts?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:50:54 GMT
Viewed: 
728 times
  
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:43:26 GMT, Scott Edward Sanburn uttered the following
profundities...
War II. The japanese were the ones that destroyed Pearl Harbor, killing innocent
civilians, plus military personnel. We had to respond, and we did. The United
States had invasion plans for the mainland of Japan, and were gearing up for
that until the nuclear bombs were ready and the go ahead was ordered. Wars are
not nice, are not friendly, and most of all, not politically correct. When you
fight a war, to win, you use whatever means necessary in order to do that.
Estimates were over 1 million to two million Allies casualties, and the
estimates for winning were from 1948 to 1950! The nuclear weapons ended Japans
ability to respond, and they surrendered. Yes it was horrible, yes it was
tragic, but it was war. The Japanese started it, we finished it. Pure and
simple. We do not need to apologize.

Pearl Harbour was a military target. Hiroshima and Nagasaki
were civilian cities. There were sufficient industrial and
military targets available that would have resulted in
Japanese surrender. Granted, what the Japanese did
throughout Asia was horrendous, and that it was war, but
that is no justification for incinerating civilian cities.

And yes, I am fully aware of Dresden, a civilian target,
targeted by the Royal Air Force, with a similar, if not
higher, death toll. The only difference was that incendiary
bombs were used, not atomic. But no less reprehensible.
--
_____________________________________________________________
richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam.(lugnet excepted)
Web Site:   http://freespace.virgin.net/richard.dee/lego.html
ICQ 13177071                  AOL Instant Messenger: RJD88888
_____________________________________________________________
For the best Lego news, visit:    http://www.lugnet.com/news/
Need instructions for a model?       http://www.kl.net/scans/
_____________________________________________________________



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lego Holocaust art (Was: can someone help me identify these parts?)
 
(...) I'm not convinced. I think we basically had to really drive home that we don't view the world the way they did, and that we were willing to do anything possible to destroy them. I think we managed that with as little loss of value as possible. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lego Holocaust art (Was: can someone help me identify these parts?)
 
(...) Do you have specific examples? This is a very vague and rather flagrant insult for the South, especially since there are a lot of places everywhere in the world where people of all creeds, colors, etc., can not go because of safety concerns. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

54 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR