| |
It would appear that as normal my ISP is isn't getting all the threads about this
thing, and I'm therefore getting the wrong impression. I wish to apologize for
sounding ungrateful to people like Larry who's actions I have misinterpreted due to
not having all the facts.
Sorry
Mark H.
Patricia Schempp wrote:
> Mark Harrison wrote:
>
> > Am I the only one that thinks this deal is getting a little slimy?
> >
> > Mark H.
>
>
> I think your repeated mean spirited posts are what is slimy here. Why not let the
> blood pressure drop for awhile? This is the first *possibility* of an order from
> TLG so why do you want to push it? Please just wait and see how and if it goes
> for the sake of the whole LEGO community. Be happy for your brother, then learn
> from his experience.
>
> Why are you so hung up on money? Your comments seem to show a bitter man with
> dollars signs in front of his eyes....
>
> "This consortium, is it a group of like minded cashed up profiteering middle
> men..."?
>
> "the members are trying to subsidise their own parts purchases by buying up excess
> part run stock and flogging/auctioning it to the rest of us at what they hope is a
> handsome profit."
>
> "You get your money back if the deal falls thru or you get the parts from lego,
> where's the risk?"
>
> "Your not doing anyone a favour by putting a $500 minimum on a purchase."
>
> And then maybe you just hate people from the U.S. with money since you felt the
> need to make this comment, which didn't endear your attitude to me at all.
>
> "As I've been away all last week, I missed this thread. I can't say I much like
>
> the sound of it. Sending Lego NZ's spare parts stock to the US isn't much
> better than dumping it. I thought you would be wanting to keep it in the
> southern hemisphere rather than have it swallowed up by a number of rich yanks
> who will find it hard to part with any of it."
>
> I'm sorry if some cashed up, profiteering, rich yank middle man flogged you at
> auction. That's not what the consortium is about however, whether you believe it
> or not. I don't know the root of your bitterness, but I don't think its healthy
> for what the LUGNET community is trying to do.
>
> Patricia Schempp
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
62 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
