| |
In lugnet.trains, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
> [...]
> What I could like to know is how this is being done, what sort of
> process it is, etc. Then I might be able to put together my own
> consortium of Castle nuts to get what WE want.
>
> Let this group of people get what they can get, I just don't see the
> reason for all this cloak and dagger stuff. If the deal is on the up
> and up, and TLG has at least tacitly approved it, why not discuss it
> if there's even a shred of a chance of someone else being able to pull
> it off in the future?
> [...]
I'm just a bystander here (not participating in the consortium) so I'm not
in possession of many facts, but it's worth noting is that the discussion
actually started 5 days ago in .trains and has only recently wandered into
other groups like .general; so there's actually quite a thread history.
The original message may shed a bit of light on some of the questions being
asked today:
http://www.lugnet.com/trains/?n=1978
Here's the whole thread in brief (indented):
http://www.lugnet.com/trains/?n=1978&t=i&v=b
and here it is in full chronological form:
http://www.lugnet.com/trains/?n=1978&t=f&v=a
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Train doors and windows
|
| (...) Just to be clear, either you don't agree with me or I'm misunderstanding what you're saying here and later on. I have absolutely NO desire to change, adjust, alter, or anything else, this deal going through with Larry's coordination. He's only (...) (25 years ago, 29-Aug-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
|
62 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
