Subject:
|
Re: Who here in Legoland has a Cable modem?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Sep 1999 15:24:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
622 times
|
| |
|
|
I am with Matthew on this one. Another good reason to design to 640 x 480
is that the text wraps to an easier to read line than full screen 1024 x 768
(or larger). Also, some folks have older video cards that do not support
such large resolutions.
When I had an older system, I always hated having to scroll across to see
the whole image or worse yet, read an entire line of text.
Bring back HTML 1.0!
John Matthews
Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message
news:slrn7u67u3.ast.mattdm@jadzia.bu.edu...
> Mookie <Mookie1@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> > I have a 14 inch and 15 inch monitor and I see no reason why you can't
> > design a page to at least 1024 by 768. I have no problem seeing pages
>
> I find it annoying when people want a really wide browser. I like to have
> multiple windows open on my screen, so even when I'm running at ungodly • high
> resolutions, I like people to design for width of 640, or worst case 800.
>
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller ---> • mattdm@mattdm.org
> Quotes 'R' Us ---> • http://quotes-r-us.org/
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Who here in Legoland has a Cable modem?
|
| (...) I find it annoying when people want a really wide browser. I like to have multiple windows open on my screen, so even when I'm running at ungodly high resolutions, I like people to design for width of 640, or worst case 800. (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
