Subject:
|
Re: Who here in Legoland has a Cable modem?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Sep 1999 05:14:39 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@[stopspammers]mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
633 times
|
| |
|
|
Mookie <Mookie1@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> I have a 14 inch and 15 inch monitor and I see no reason why you can't
> design a page to at least 1024 by 768. I have no problem seeing pages
I find it annoying when people want a really wide browser. I like to have
multiple windows open on my screen, so even when I'm running at ungodly high
resolutions, I like people to design for width of 640, or worst case 800.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Who here in Legoland has a Cable modem?
|
| I am with Matthew on this one. Another good reason to design to 640 x 480 is that the text wraps to an easier to read line than full screen 1024 x 768 (or larger). Also, some folks have older video cards that do not support such large resolutions. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Who here in Legoland has a Cable modem?
|
| I have a 14 inch and 15 inch monitor and I see no reason why you can't design a page to at least 1024 by 768. I have no problem seeing pages on either monitor. I can even put the 14incher into 1600x1200 with no problems.. of course it is a .25dpi (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
