To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 7529
7528  |  7530
Subject: 
Re: McDonalds set
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 04:25:21 GMT
Viewed: 
1071 times
  
Quite simply, many bidders treat neutral feeback as being negative.


Larry Pieniazek wrote:

I'd like to think that if I ever put a lot on Ebay and mistakenly said
something that turned out not to be true, then I'd be given the chance
to withdraw the lot and re-auction with the correct information _before_
someone irreversibly left me neutral feedback.

Hmm... I see your point (and maybe we're veering into market.theory
areas), but what is bad about neutral feedback, per se? it's not
NEGATIVE... merely not positive.

--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: McDonalds set
 
(...) Seems the feedback system is broken, then. (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: McDonalds set
 
(...) You may well be right but it's more work. Presenting facts ONLY via feedback seems easy. No judgement of the seller is implied. The TOS (which I posted a link to just now) talks of feedback extortion. I think if no communication is made, no (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)

81 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR