Subject:
|
Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:59:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.com^NoMoreSpam^
|
Viewed:
|
1272 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> > But it seems SO clear cut to me. In my opinion Heinz doesn't have the
> > right to the drug. If this drug really truly is somehting Heinz is
> > incapable of inventing for himself, it's not just or right to defraud
>
> So in your schema, right to property is more important than right to life.
Neither more nor less, because they are not actually different things.
Right to life and right to property are the same thing. ALL rights are
property rights in my schema.
The "right to life" as I see it is my right to dispose of my life as I
see fit. It is not my "right" to your goods in order to prolong my life.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
81 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
