Subject:
|
Re: McDonalds set
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Sep 1999 14:50:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
840 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Fair warning to all who read this. I WILL do it again if I discover your
> listing and judge it to be egregiously misleading. your feedback will
> not comment on you, merely present verifiable facts.
While I understand the sentiments, wouldn't it be better to contact
the seller first? I'd imagine it is possible that people may make
claims that are misleading, simply because they themselves were
misinformed and believed what they were saying was correct.
I'd like to think that if I ever put a lot on Ebay and mistakenly said
something that turned out not to be true, then I'd be given the chance
to withdraw the lot and re-auction with the correct information _before_
someone irreversibly left me neutral feedback.
Simon
http://www.SimonRobinson.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: McDonalds set
|
| (...) You may well be right but it's more work. Presenting facts ONLY via feedback seems easy. No judgement of the seller is implied. The TOS (which I posted a link to just now) talks of feedback extortion. I think if no communication is made, no (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: McDonalds set
|
| (...) Not bad. Except that to do so is a violation of eBay TOS as i understand them. And I think that the TOS apply to you as a reader of eBay content whether or not you actually have an ID there. So not an option for me in addition to being more (...) (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
81 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
