Debate : 2254


Off-Topic / Debate / 2254	2253 \| 2255

Subject:	Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:56:41 GMT
Reply-To:	[mattdm@mattdm.org]Spamless[]
Viewed:	1202 times

Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote: > But it seems SO clear cut to me. In my opinion Heinz doesn't have the > right to the drug. If this drug really truly is somehting Heinz is > incapable of inventing for himself, it's not just or right to defraud So in your schema, right to property is more important than right to life. -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
(...) Neither more nor less, because they are not actually different things. Right to life and right to property are the same thing. ALL rights are property rights in my schema. The "right to life" as I see it is my right to dispose of my life as I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
(...) Weeeelllll... I know I'm walking into the same old debate as before! But it seems SO clear cut to me. In my opinion Heinz doesn't have the right to the drug. If this drug really truly is somehting Heinz is incapable of inventing for himself, (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

81 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search