To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 19915
19914  |  19916
Subject: 
Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:30:31 GMT
Viewed: 
73 times
  
(Removing .loc.au because it's not really Aussie-specific anymore, if it
ever was)

In lugnet.dear-lego, Will Hess writes:
Lego may tout the fact that Duplo works with System but in my limited
experience (my daughter and my brother who is 14 years younger than I) I
have never seen that put into action.

Well, Todd did some great things with Duplo dinos...but I agree, there's
not much *reason* to make them work together.

I also agree with her thoughts regarding juniorization but would like to add
a thought to the discussion.  One of the biggest obsticales (sp?) to
becomming the "leading brand among families with children" is that well over
half their market is ignored at retail outlets (here in the US)...the girls.
Look at the Lego shelf next time you're at the toy store...what is there
that would keep girls coming back?  I know that for my part there's nothing
there I'd want to get for my daughter.  Until Lego addresses this imbalance
I'd say that they'll have a tough time realizing their stated goal.  They
may have brand RECGONITION but brand LOYALTY...not likely.

I wouldn't mind seeing stuff aimed at girls that wasn't so...well...
Barbie-esque.  But that's just personal.  I find the amount of pink to be
offputting, and the suggestion that everything feminine is pink kind of
sets my teeth on edge.

My other big problem with the Scala/Belville sets is summed up best in the
words of the NLNLF when she got to that part of the catalog: "There's no
building!"  It seems like the sets specifically aimed at girls have far
fewer pieces, so you can't do as much with them.  In some ways, they miss
what I see as the 'point' of LEGO even more than the Town Jr. sets do.

I wonder how well the older System sets (which seemed to me to be a bit
more gender-neutral, with shops and houses and things rather than
policemen and firemen and construction workers) sold to girls, in
comparison to the current ones?

And on a related note, why does LEGO seem to be so reluctant to sell their
girl-targetted lines in the US?  Or is it the retailers who are reluctant
to carry them?


J



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
 
(...) Agreed. Pink pieces are gross, and can't be reused in a normal town without being noticed for being recycled Barbie-esque sets. If placed next to any other colour, it looks wrong. (...) The dead Paradisa line was pretty good to build. My (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
 
I must say that I agree 100% with Deidre's point about compatibility between Lego brands (Primo, Duplo, System). My wife and I gave some Duplo to our daughter on her first birthday. It was quite a while before she put her first pieces together but (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)

45 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR