 | | What's the name of the little brother of big 24x43 technic wheel? (25x??)
|
|
(URL) It's the ones that came with the 8879 (?) yellow technic tractor. I was just wondering if somebody could take a look at the tyre and tell me the radius (it's written on it), since the Little People has hidden my own versions, and I need the (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
I have created several wheels that fit a metal axle: (URL) x447 for the 4 studded train wheel with traction teeth (not on the Parts Tracker, yet) I created at least two versions of each: without the metal axle and with the metal axle (complete). (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) Unfortunately I haven't worked on the other two dragon body parts the last months. The head-details takes me to trouble. nad then there is only the outer hull. See here: (URL) would be glad, if anybody else wants to complete the parts. CU (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) ... and the revised version is now on the Parts Tracker at (URL) (20 years ago, 26-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) They do! didn't you know (or expect) this? :-) (URL) The full comic is (URL) here>, by the way. With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) Really? Cool. I couldn't find it listed in the Parts Tracker. Foolish me for not considering the possibility that minifigs might randomly like to wander around holding a handful of scorching hot fire, huh? ;P Anyways, you wouldn't happen to (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) That one is under "Minifig Flame" -Orion (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) It does. I can see that there are still a few polygons missing around the two raised studs, but at least the height correction means it'll be easier to line up a part on them. (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) Hmm, yes it would have. So would other parts with weird curvy surfaces like the flame/seaweed piece (considering the fact that the first dragon's body parts have all been completed, I'm surprised that I can't find that part anywhere). (...) I (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) OK, I'm revising this part - basically the whole underside needs re-working. Even the outlines that are there are not correct. Watch this space. Chris (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) I have posted a slightly improved version of 6058.dat to the Parts Tracker at (URL) does not solve all the problems with this part, but includes - correct height alignment of studs at z=70 and the adjoining fillets - realignment of bad quad on (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) Aack! This would've been a nice part to (URL) 3D Scan>. But short of FedExing the part to me at my hotel (as I don't have one on hand) that's probably not gonna happen.. I could try to have one of my students take a stab at it in 3DStudio or (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) Hmm, I guess nobody cares about it but me. :) I recently found out that it was officially discontinued as a LEGO brick (as compared to just not having been used for a while), which was a bit disappointing, since at the time I needed eight (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
(...) For some unknown reason, part 2463 is pretty much an empty shell with no bottom at all. It has edge lines on the bottom out in empty space, but no surfaces. It appears that this file hasn't been touched since 1999. It's not currently on the (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
|
I downloaded copies of LDraw and MLcad a few days ago, and I've been building digital versions of a few of my models, but I ran into a couple of problems: 1. Using MLcad, I couldn't get (URL) this piece> to close flush to (URL) this piece>. There (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Boat parts (like in set #775-1)
|
|
Hi all, A while back I started to create these parts: x145c0? Boat Section Bow 5 x 6 x 3 & 1/3 x146c0? Boat Section Middle 6 x 8 x 3 & 1/3 x147c0? Boat Section Stern 6 x 6 x 3 & 1/3 I completed the middle section (which was relatively easy) but got (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Thanks. New versions of the other official click hinge bricks are now on the Parts Tracker (URL) (20 years ago, 18-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) Yuck! >:^( (...) Did you see this one? No light blue, bright white only on the right side overlap. (URL) (...) But look at the right edge of the rocket on this pic. You can clearly see the white is brighter where the light grey lines come in (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) (2 URLs) check this out. instead of 505 I just used a costum, dithered color with: 255 255 255 255 193 169 it is obvious to me that it's just a lack of LDraw colors ... (...) honey bunny, you are totally wrong on this side ;-) it's not at all (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-colanar quads question
|
|
(...) Be careful with that. You could also replace it with triangles (ABD and DBC) using the other diagonal. I think one way will give you a nice convex exterior and the other way will create all sorts of nasty concavities. You can do some origami (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-coplanar quads question
|
|
DOH! Who stole the P? (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Non-colanar quads question
|
|
I'm fixing the Perl code that generates the curved surface of the Half [1] Onion Dome (part 44511) from its control data. At the moment the surface comprises counter-clockwise wound quads (ABCD) [3] and conditional lines (AB, BC, CD and DA). (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) I think you have made an assumption about the particular parts you are using as a model. The printing process LEGO uses/used for this is faulty, and the white strips you are referring to on the rocket and helmet appear to me to be simply an (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) The first, definitely. Also, looking at the second scanned image (sorry, I snipped it from this reply), the white 'seam' down the side of the astronaut's helmet appears to be strictly a printing defect - the white ink is positioned slightly (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) The surface of this brick is perfectly smooth, so the blue pattern I see is not caused by brick texture, but by the screen printing process. Nevertheless, looking at the two mock-ups, I think the white version is closer to what it "should" (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) Ok, which looks "right"? This: (URL) or this: (URL) C'mon. It's classic space, not Power Rangers (or Knights Kingdom). There are no light blue spacemen or spaceships in classic space. The moon is not made of bleu cheese. Look with the eyes of (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) hm ... this is in tune with steve (initially I used light blue 9): "Yes, I think it would work better to use color 503 (light gray from Mosaic) instead of light blue. If those zones are really a vary light shade of blue, you could try 505 (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) I agree with you - my mistake. I'll correct it. (...) hmm ... I'm not a print-wizard nor skilled in what's needed to make a dithered color of some kind. I do not believe that we should "interpret" what's supposed to see, but what we are (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) I have now located my copy of this part. The areas you mention defintely have a feint blue coloration. I believe this is deliberate, as I can make out the regular pattern of screening dots. This is most obvious on the larger areas, but I (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) I haven't found the part yet, but I've found the sister spacewalk brick and examined it. If you flip the brick over you can clearly see that it's not quite smooth. Compare it to a smooth brick and you'll see what I mean. This was probably done (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) Willy, From my own point of view, It looks like the inside lining of the rocket is also 505 the one separating the outside (left) 505 and the gray shadow on the rocket is supposed to be white. I like it the way it is, but consider one thing: I (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) I have the part, so I've been holding off commenting until I can look at it. But I lack patience, so... In my mind, I remember the part as having shades of white and grey on the questionable bits. Therefore the light blue just plain looks (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
I don't have the part, but the photos posted make it look to me like the blue from the part is slightly visible through the paint. So the paint in the areas in question doesn't contain any blue. Having said that, the two red circles highlighted in (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
hi folks, we are seeking a helping hand to define the color scheme of this part: (URL) there has already been a discussion with orion and steve through e-mail, but it led to no end. the most critical point is the white-bluish color 505: (URL) up to (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: part 47405
|
|
(...) Probably good enough for most usage (URL) file can be found here after moderation - (URL) are a number of errors that need resolving before submitting to the Parts Tracker (if anyone else feels like doing these, just let me know) (URL) = (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: exhib.dat - Container 8 x 3 x 3 HO Car Showcase [DAT]
|
|
As seen in sets: (URL) there more sets? (I guess so) 0 Container 8 x 3 x 3 HO Car Showcase 0 Name: exhib.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 KEYWORDS garage, container, window, classic, h0 scale 0 Unofficial Part 0 PEERON x1104 0 CMDLINE -c47 0 BFC (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Definition of the new colors
|
|
Hi all, I don't know, if this has been made somebody else, but I've made a color-definition for the new colors (Lt-Bluish-Gray, Dk-Bluish-Gray and Reddish-Brown): 0 Definition of the new colors 0 COLOR 68 Light-Bluish-Gray 0 174 178 182 255 174 178 (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
(...) Better late than never (URL) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 32180 Tyre 56 x 30 R (Balloon Tyre for 6595 Wheel 49.6 x 28 VR)
|
|
(...) That particular file isn't quite formatted right. The line 0 FILE 32180s.dat should probably be 0 FILE s/32180s.dat To view [DAT] links you need to register a viewing program for the mime types associated with DAT, LDR, and MPD files. I think (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 32180 Tyre 56 x 30 R (Balloon Tyre for 6595 Wheel 49.6 x 28 VR)
|
|
Hey. I'm kinda new to this whole parts thing, but I've been building with Lego for a long time. I was wondering if someone could walk me through the whole downloading process, seeing as the file I get is always called 'ldraw[1]' and I have no idea (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Looking for .dat for 1x2 tile with MONEY pattern
|
|
Desperately in need of the mlcad dat file for this part: (URL) thought I'd ask the talented part makers here for some help. I would be eternally thankful! :) Thanks, Corey www.brickitgood.com (20 years ago, 24-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
I should point out that priority and override are features of GLIDE and are not explicitly specified in the format. (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
(...) I have tried to accommodate these sorts of behaviours in two ways: Priority and override. If two parts have different behaviours like a "dot" and a "Brick" the one that is moved to form the connection is the one that takes priority. If you (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) Not just yet please... I’d like to get clicking working first before GLIDE gets announced to the world at large. Unfortunately experience tells me that my time estimates on programming are always a bit optimistic. I "think" I will be able to (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
(...) Long-term, making connection data a part of the library would be awesome. Short-term, getting a working implementation should be the focus. Dan (Bennett) - would you like some publicity for GLIDE and click authors on LDraw.org? I can't spare (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
(...) Note also that a 1x4 brick can be attached to a 2x4 brick anywhere on about 70-80 degree angle if only attached by the end stud - its only the other studs hitting the sides that restrict it. ROSCO (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
I guess I'm thinking about this differently. It's not that the individual studs on the brick don't allow other mating angles. (IE you can place a 1 x 6 technic plate with rounded ends on any single stud at some funcky angles) It's the combination of (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
(...) I really like the way the .dat format reuses geometry e.g. stud.dat. I think the clicking format should be able to do the same thing. I imagine that would be quite a bit more difficult to reuse if the clicking info was in the dat files. (...) (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
(...) I do indeed think it would be undesirable. As we all know Stud.dat gets used every ware. There are a fair few instances were the clicking behaviours of two bricks would be different even though they are both referencing the same stud.dat file (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
(...) I agree, but in the short term, I think seperate files may be simpler. (...) I thought so too, but the format document (way at the bottom) implies that this might be undesirable. I'm not sure I understand why, though : ( (20 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
(...) There's a difference between supporting POV inline (which is not controlled in the community) and supporting LCD info (which could be integrated into the DAT format). I'd like to see programs support both options - both as an external .lcd (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
The it would be slick to have the LCD info in the dat file, but it might complicate issues being dicussed by the Ldraw committee : ( It seems that pov style includes aren't allowd in official files either so maybe keeping it seperate for a while (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
(...) inline in a valid DAT file? Perhaps make all the lines start with a "0 LCD" before anything else? Then, when reading a DAT file, a program can recognize and parse LCD info, in addition to looking for the .lcd file. Does that make sense? Do you (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE. Click authors required.
|
|
Hi Glide has been on hold now for about a month but its back in development. You can look forward to clicking bricks in about two to three weeks. Once I have the system implemented is there anyone out there who would be prepared to start writing (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Yep Chris, taking into account the curves where the lugs join the brick, I'd say it's darn good now, thanks! ROSCO (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) <SNIP> (...) New versions of the 1x4 parts are on the PT now (URL) please, before I apply the same changes to the other parts. Chris (20 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)? [DAT]
|
|
(...) We are both partially right - but there is a generic problem with these parts. The important dimension is the position of the axis of rotation of the click hinge, relative to the brick. For the geometry to work this must be the same distance (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
Guess what? I missed this update! I do not have any of the parts in it in my library. Thanks for pointing it out Willy. Jaco (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
(...) of the underside area is missing. (...) SNIP 2003-03 New Parts Preview (URL) 30249.dat - Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 (URL) w. (20 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
(...) Being indeed part 30249, why is (...) it is: 2003-03 New Parts Preview (URL) 30249.dat - Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 (URL) w. (20 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 [DAT]
|
|
(...) 0 Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 0 Name: 30249.dat 0 Author: Joseph H. Cardana 0 Unofficial LDraw part 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 2 24 10 120 -100 10 116 -100 2 24 6 120 -96 6 116 -96 2 24 -6 116 -96 6 116 -96 2 24 -6 120 -96 -6 116 -96 2 24 -6 4 -20 -6 116 (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
You have a duplicated quad on the non sloped outside surface. Also the top part of the underside area is missing. (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 [DAT]
|
|
0 Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 0 Name: 30249.dat 0 Author: Joseph H. Cardana 0 Unofficial LDraw part 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 2 24 10 120 -100 10 116 -100 2 24 6 120 -96 6 116 -96 2 24 -6 116 -96 6 116 -96 2 24 -6 120 -96 -6 116 -96 2 24 -6 4 -20 -6 116 -96 2 24 (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
(...) Do so. Please remove those incompatible ROTATION CENTER and ROTATION CONFIG lines and either add BFC NOCERTIFY or BFC-certify it. /Tore (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
Taking another closer look, I noticed only the center and zero point are wrong, but that can easily be fixed. I have done so, but would like to credit the original author on this part. "Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> schreef in bericht (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
(...) This is a very old message, but I needed this part and thought it was part of the official parts for a long time... Being indeed part 30249, why is this one still not part of the library? I can see nothing wrong with it, beside it is not BFC (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) my click hinges, and the lugs are ALL closer to the top of vertical end wall than the bottom. The position of the lug in your new version is definitely incorrect. Whether thats a problem with the primitive or the sub-part I don't know, but it (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Actually its the other way about. 30387 is wrong. More accurately, the subpart s/30387s01.dat does not match the guidance notes in p/clh1 and p/clh4. 0 // Placement on side of bricks; rotate accordingly, 0 // place on side 10 Ldu below top (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30299.dat Rock Raiders Canopy base
|
|
(...) The link to the 30298.dat mockup has expired. Do you or anyone you know have a copy of it? (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 2495, Minifig Hand Truck
|
|
Has anyone heard anything new about the minifig Hand Truck, part number 2495 (URL) ? Last thing I've noticed is from two years ago, someone said "nope, not yet". I was just seeing if anyone was working on it. It's not in the parts tracker, but that (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: high res bushlocks? [DAT]
|
|
(...) You're probably right. I just remembered that the bushlocks are divided into 32 segments which is fairly colse to 48. Though the notches in bushloc3 would probably align better with the studs if they used the high res primitves at least in (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) without measuring, just by sight, I'd say the 1x2 is the incorrect one, it's lugs should be moved up to match the 1x4 ROSCO (20 years ago, 6-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Joel Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'll do what I can to correct the official part library in the next parts update. Chris Dee (20 years ago, 6-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: high res bushlocks?
|
|
(...) I think they are fine the way they are. The basic reason is size. The bushlocks are 20 LDU in diameter. 48-segment primitives are not needed until you get to 80 LDU diameter curves. If you need to put 48-segment primitives with a bushlock, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for Roborider parts
|
|
(...) I believe both of those parts are on the Parts Tracker. Search through the list at (URL) (20 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30176.dat - Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves
|
|
(...) Wow! You are my hero :-) Now I can finish modelling and rendering my latest creation: House on the Hill. Pictures soon. Thanks Tore! Jaco (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves
|
|
(...) You are too kind :-) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about creating Cone 4 x 4 x 3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) Okay, thanx for the answer. The part is now on the Parts Tracker as x272.dat Niels (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Subpart: 30176s01.dat - Bamboo Leaf (Mockup) [DAT]
|
|
0 Bamboo Leaf (Mockup) 0 Name: 30176s01.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Subpart 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 10 0 0 0 1 -0.05 1 0 0 0 0 1 2-4edge.dat 1 16 10 0 0 0 1 -0.05 1 0 0 0 0 -1 2-4edge.dat 1 16 9.95 0 0 0 9.05 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 30176.dat - Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves [DAT]
|
|
0 Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves 0 Name: 30176.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3062b.dat 1 16 0 8 0 0.643 0 0.766 0 1 0 -0.766 0 0.643 30176s01.dat 1 16 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves
|
|
(...) Just for you, I bought a 7081 set today, and I'll give the plant a try. /Tore (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves
|
|
(...) I found out that according this site (URL) partnumber must be 30176. Would this be correct? And, can someone make it? Thanks. Jaco (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
I'm working on modeling a recent creation in MLcad, and noticed that there is a difference in the height of the .dat versions of these parts: (2 URLs) When they are lined up side-by-side, the click hinge portions do not line up. This picture is (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 16L sailmast *30219.dat*
|
|
It looks ok. I added these two lines in my local copy of the file: 0 Unofficial Part 0 BFC NOCERTIFY /Tore (20 years ago, 1-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about creating Cone 4 x 4 x 3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) Are you saying that the LEGO on the stud is rotated 45 degrees from how you would expect it to be aligned? Or are you saying something else. if the former, I agree with Don, I'd have the default orientation the one that people are most likely (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 16L sailmast *30219.dat* [DAT]
|
|
seen in arctic set 6579 original code modified from franklin cain's part 0 Bar 16L with Hollow Studs, Towball, and Slit 0 Name: 30219.dat 0 Original Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Author: Thomas Burger 0 KEYWORDS Arctic, Xtreme Team, Xtreme Stunts, (...) (20 years ago, 31-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about creating Cone 4 x 4 x 3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) I don't really want a part rotated 45 degrees from direction it's going to be placed. The Ldraw 'A' command works in 90 degree angles. That's why I chose the orientation I did for the mockup. Plus it matches the other cones. I'd say leave the (...) (20 years ago, 31-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, William Howard wrote: (snip) I wanted to close the loop on this.. William is right, and I was incorrect about the cross section. I agree that there is no recurve in the part, and thus no figure 8 cross sections when put back (...) (20 years ago, 31-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves
|
|
Has anyone modelled this part: (URL) it does not seem hard, but I do not have the skills to make it. Just use the 1x1 brick round and model the leaves once and use them three times? :-) Jaco (20 years ago, 30-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Question about creating Cone 4 x 4 x 3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) I happened to get me a seccond hand trainset 725, including two of these cones. So I have started on creating this part for LDraw. By looking at the orientation of the stud and the inner details it seems that this part was creating 45 degrees (...) (20 years ago, 30-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "Minifig Fire Helmet Breathing Hose"(x171)
|
|
(...) I am sorry to tell you that this part is currently not appear in MLCAD or LDRAW, you might try to use other parts to replace just as that avitor goggles (20 years ago, 30-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 10129 Rebel Snowspeeder
|
|
(...) Orion, Are either of the wedge parts you mentioned available, either officially or unofficially? Thanks. -Joel (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | "Minifig Fire Helmet Breathing Hose"(x171)
|
|
Hi. Does anyone have a LDRAW DATA of below parts? ; (URL) I'm trying to model my special task force "BrickHound" on MLCAD, so I need above part-data to make them actable through the night. ; (URL) you would have/know unofficial data of this part, (...) (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | high res bushlocks?
|
|
I think that the bushlock primitves should be updated to align with the 48 segment primitves. What do others think? (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw Part Request - Goblet Fill
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Mark Chittenden wrote: --snip-- (...) Ahh, that's perfect! Just what I needed, thanks. :) Nothing too detailed and overdone, just makes it look like people aren't drinking from empty glasses. :) Thanks a ton for helping. If (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw Part Request - Goblet Fill
|
|
(...) Whipped up a simple "filler" piece for the goblet. Fills the goblet to 3/4's full. Works best as a solid color in a translucent goblet. Here's a pic, the part will be available via my Brickshelf folder when it passes moderation. The goblet on (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw Part Request - Goblet Fill
|
|
I was hoping someone could help me out with this. I'd do it myself, except I don't have the skills yet. I'm looking for something to fill the castle goblet. It needs to look right for a drink inside the goblet (this means maybe even not up to the (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9v train motor - 590.dat
|
|
Hi, I have included Anton Raves POV-code in to my 590 file. See the difference here: (URL) (LDraw) (URL) (Raves) Jeroen "Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Hy6FL6.13JH@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) classic (...) on top (...) (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9v train motor - 590.dat
|
|
(...) Also, I notice the technic pin on the bogie plate is shorter than it should be - the dat file has it as 12 LDU tall when I measure the actual pin to be 14 LDU tall. I think Ryan may have been alluding to this when he talked about the height (...) (20 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9v train motor - 590.dat
|
|
(...) Hi Ryan, I just saw that your posting is 4 years old. And during all this time noone has ever fixed this bug in 590.dat And I'm sure it is a bug! Here is a picture that shows what is wrong with this part: (URL) I hope that after all this time (...) (20 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
