Subject:
|
Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:57:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3228 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Joel Hoornbeek wrote:
| |
I’m working on modeling a recent creation in MLcad, and noticed that there
is a difference in the height of the .dat versions of these parts:
When they are lined up side-by-side, the click hinge portions do not line
up. This picture is saved from MLcad, and shows the problem:
Has anyone else noticed this?
-Joel
P.S. This is the fourth time I’ve tried to post this... Let’s hope I get
the confirmation e-mail this time.
|
Joel
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I’ll do what I can to correct the
official part library in the next parts update.
|
without measuring, just by sight, I’d say the 1x2 is the incorrect one, it’s
lugs should be moved up to match the 1x4
ROSCO
|
Actually its the other way about. 30387 is wrong. More accurately, the subpart
s/30387s01.dat does not match the guidance notes in p/clh1 and p/clh4.
0 // Placement on side of bricks; rotate accordingly,
0 // place on side 10 Ldu below top surface.
I’ve uploaded a corrected version to the parts tracker
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/s/30387s01.dat
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
| (...) my click hinges, and the lugs are ALL closer to the top of vertical end wall than the bottom. The position of the lug in your new version is definitely incorrect. Whether thats a problem with the primitive or the sub-part I don't know, but it (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
