Special:
|
[DAT] (requires LDraw-compatible viewer)
|
Subject:
|
Re: high res bushlocks?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Jun 2004 19:17:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4897 times
|
| |
|
|
> I think they are fine the way they are. The basic reason is size. The bushlocks are
> 20 LDU in diameter. 48-segment primitives are not needed until you get to 80 LDU
> diameter curves.
You're probably right. I just remembered that the bushlocks are divided into 32
segments which is fairly colse to 48. Though the notches in bushloc3 would
probably align better with the studs if they used the high res primitves at
least in those areas. Take a look at this model from the top to see what I mean.
0
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3003.dat
1 16 0 -24 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 bushloc3.dat
0
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: high res bushlocks?
|
| (...) I think they are fine the way they are. The basic reason is size. The bushlocks are 20 LDU in diameter. 48-segment primitives are not needed until you get to 80 LDU diameter curves. If you need to put 48-segment primitives with a bushlock, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
