Subject:
|
Re: LUGNet Chat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 12:46:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3955 times
|
| |
|
|
Once upon a time, mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) wrote:
> Perhaps a Princess.... <sarah@eskimo.com> wrote:
> > In Your Opinion
>
> Well. It's not a baseless opinion. It has very limited terminal emulation
> capability, has trouble understanding that a standard terminal screen size
> is 80x25, doesn't let you create an address book.... Not to mention simple
> aesthetic issues (which can be significant if you're going to be using it
> for any length of time) like being able to change the colors used. (Can you
> even change the font? I forget.) Anyway, it's not meant to be a full
> featured telnet program. It's like using Windows Write as a word processor.
> (Or worse.)
For address book, do you mean a list of servers? Win95 telnet
compiles this automatically as you visit servers.
You can change the colors by going to Terminal | Preferences.
Background Color has its own button, foreground color is changed in
the Fonts dialog.
And of course, the font is changed in Terminal | Preferences | Font.
But in your last statement, you are completely correct. It isn't a
full-featured program. The terminal.exe included in Win3.x was more
powerful (but I don't know if it could telnet).
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LUGNet Chat
|
| (...) Uh... Hyperterminal replaces Terminal in Win 3.x, NOT telnet.exe And yes, Hyperterminal works MUCH better than Terminal. I had to buy ProComm Plus in Win 3.X In Win95, I just used Hyperterminal until I finally went SLIP/PPP (forget which I (...) (28 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: LUGNet Chat
|
| [Followup set to lugnet.off-topic.debate] (...) An address book is better than that. Win95 just remembers where you've been last. A real address book will let you specify which hosts to save, and lets you do things like specify different options (...) (28 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LUGNet Chat
|
| (...) In Your Opinion IMO, WIn95's telnet does EVERYTHING I need it to. It is better than most, in fact. It has copy+paste capability, and logging. :) I don't know what more is needed. (I've never sent anything over telnet that needs encryption. If (...) (28 years ago, 9-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
