Subject:
|
Re: LUGNet Chat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Oct 1998 23:10:12 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.org%antispam%
|
Viewed:
|
1239 times
|
| |
|
|
Perhaps a Princess.... <sarah@eskimo.com> wrote:
> In Your Opinion
Well. It's not a baseless opinion. It has very limited terminal emulation
capability, has trouble understanding that a standard terminal screen size
is 80x25, doesn't let you create an address book.... Not to mention simple
aesthetic issues (which can be significant if you're going to be using it
for any length of time) like being able to change the colors used. (Can you
even change the font? I forget.) Anyway, it's not meant to be a full
featured telnet program. It's like using Windows Write as a word processor.
(Or worse.)
> (I've never sent anything over telnet that needs encryption. If that
> is important. Yeah. Telnet won't do that natively)
Have you sent your password?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LUGNet Chat
|
| (...) In Your Opinion IMO, WIn95's telnet does EVERYTHING I need it to. It is better than most, in fact. It has copy+paste capability, and logging. :) I don't know what more is needed. (I've never sent anything over telnet that needs encryption. If (...) (26 years ago, 9-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
