Subject:
|
Re: LUGNet Chat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:15:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdmAVOIDSPAM.org
|
Viewed:
|
991 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Franks <richard@__no_spam_please_im_veggie__spider.com> wrote:
> lugnet.com:4000 or whatever is simpler for most people than finding and
> setting up an irc cliet. I tend to find that telnet chat rooms are more
> personal and friendly than irc - because you have more of a presence -
> you can emote and wander about etc :)
You can emote on IRC too!
And I doubt Todd really wants to write a MUSH!
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LUGNet Chat
|
| (...) Maybe I just haven't had good experiences of IRC, which is why I feel talkers are friendlier :) (...) True :) What I had in mind though was something like NUTS ((URL) or ew-too. These usually compile out of the archive and don't require much (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LUGNet Chat
|
| (...) What about using a telnet socket-based talker? Telnetting to lugnet.com:4000 or whatever is simpler for most people than finding and setting up an irc cliet. I tend to find that telnet chat rooms are more personal and friendly than irc - (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
