Subject:
|
Re: LUGNet Chat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 23:06:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
904 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 14:47:09 GMT, Richard Franks
<richard@__no_spam_please_im_veggie__spider.com> wrote:
What about using a telnet socket-based talker? Telnetting to
> lugnet.com:4000 or whatever is simpler for most people than finding and
> setting up an irc cliet. I tend to find that telnet chat rooms are more
> personal and friendly than irc - because you have more of a presence -
> you can emote and wander about etc :)
This is what I meant about MUSHes. IF I go somewhere to talk, it's
going to be a MUSH 98 times out of a 100 (Maybe more)
Sarah
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LUGNet Chat
|
| (...) What about using a telnet socket-based talker? Telnetting to lugnet.com:4000 or whatever is simpler for most people than finding and setting up an irc cliet. I tend to find that telnet chat rooms are more personal and friendly than irc - (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
