Subject:
|
Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:06:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
625 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Eric Kingsley writes:
> In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Joe Comeau writes:
> > Hey Team A, you know what would make this game even more interesteing? If
> > you guys needed to take something from us, like a grail or parchment showing
> > that you really don't own the land you've pilfered from the poor peasant
> > folk. At this point, it doesn't matter too much what it is, but it would be
> > something that you can see and track. What do you think?
>
> Now if you were asking yourself, I will wait for you to answer yourself but if
> you had intended to ask your opponents then I will say I like the idea. Kind
> of a capture the flag type deal.
Yeah, I like the idea-- however just to make the distinction, are we talking
about a 1-sided capture the flag, or will each team have a prize to capture?
I guess the problem being that it adds definite advantages to the team
protecting the "item" if it's only one sided...
But on that note... Since we've never "finished" a game, it's more than
entirely possible that even with only one "flag" per team, we may not
actually see a capture. How about this:
Each team has 10 points of value to the other team, to be divided amongst
objects in their initial posession (or heck, on the ground if they want--
they can place them). How they want to distribute the points among objects
is up to them, but they can't designate more than 3 points per 1 item (that
means between 4 and 10 objects, all you team A'ers!).
At the start of the game, each object in a team's posession is announced,
but its point value kept secret. As to whether or not their locations should
be obviated, I dunno. I'll leave that up to us later. But suffice to say as
objects are captured (or at the end of the game) point values are announced,
and the final victor is the team with the name "Team B".
But this leaves a lot more intelligent strategy up to the teams, and
unfortunately, we already know that intelligence is voraciously skewed in
our favor, so maybe we should just forget it and give Team A a fighting chance.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
|
| "David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:GFACM0.3L1@lugnet.com... (...) If (...) showing (...) be (...) but if (...) Kind (...) Damn, Suz, you win. They AREN'T as slow as I thought. (...) talking (...) capture? (...) Of course, we (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
|
| (...) Are you asking yourself? I could have sworn that you were Team A and we were Team B... Lets see... Ahhh here it is. Yes you are on Team A (URL) tried to make this as simple as possible knowing the limited intellect of Team A but obviously I (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
