Subject:
|
Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:01:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4176 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Bruce Hietbrink wrote:
> Jake,
>
> When running these types of surveys, it might help to run them in two phases,
> due to the way you ask people to add their own responses.
>
> For instance, under "castle" your survey then goes on to ask "what type", and
> gave the options "Black Knights", "Lord of the Rings", "Fantasy theme like
> centaurs, dwarfs, mythical animals", "Ninja", and "King Leo's Castle", plus the
> add your own option. Imagine six people vote. I added something like "modular
> castles (see 80's sets)", but suppose someone else added "sets like 6041" and
> another person said "sets in the style of Legoland Castle", and another person
> said "Things like the Guarded Inn". We'd all be asking for essentially the same
> thing, but if two people voted for "Ninja", it would look like more people want
> Ninja than anything else.
>
> In my suggestion, there'd be two phases to a survey like this. In the first you
> would ask for people's suggestions. Then, someone goes through those and
> combines the nearly identical ones above into one category. In the second
> phase, then, the voting is more concentrated, because all of the people above
> end up voting for the same thing, and it becomes more meaningful data. Of
> course this requires that someone goes through and does the job of combining,
> and someone will always object that the combined categories don't completely fit
> their suggested category.
>
> Another thing on the survey. It is not clear whether you mean what old set
> would we like rereleased as a Legend, or just general suggestions on future
> directions in what kinds of sets we want.
>
> Bruce
In the first survey, if memory serves me, someone went through the suggestions,
cleaned up, simplified, or combined suggestions, and then added it to the list.
There were numerous adds - my suggestion regarding Pirates was slightly
reworded, mostly for brevity and added to the list (where it made the top five,
IIRC). Presumably, they will do the same this time.
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
