Subject:
|
Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:12:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
16244 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager wrote:
> * Last time we stuck to backwards compatibility for a no longer updated prog we
> had to separate dithers colors into subfiles.
That is just so not true.
> Welcome to 2009.
Well then, welcome to my reality.
Viewing just a small portion of Datsville on my AMD1100, for example
TOWN-10.ldr, takes 1.8 seconds in L3Lab. But several minutes in LDView - if it
doesn't crash. I am unemployed and with absolutely no hope whatsoever of getting
a fulltime job that will make me able to afford a new PC. (And anyway, I doubt
that a top modern state of the art home PC comes close to 1.8 seconds in
LDView.)
But go ahead you guys, keep making the LDraw community more and more a
highbrowed clique, leaving all but a very small exclusive LDraw Super-Elite
behind. Keep neglecting backwards compability issues and people like Fernando
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=16378 will very soon get tired and move on from
us.
Remember when the LDraw community was teeming with activity? New parts were
added to the official library, not just added to the ever growing list of files
forever held in the Tracker. Almost anyone could create an LDraw oriented
utility program. The LDraw specs where aimed to simplicity and
user-friendliness. Now it seems professionality and correctness. So now only
professional programmers are able to come up with anything compliant.
Wrong way, IMO!
/Tore
|
|
Message has 5 Replies:
 | | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) That is not correct. The 1.8 sec are the drawing time. If you will have a look into 'statistics' you will see that most of the time the loading will take and then 1.8 sec. for the drawing is used. So this comparison is not correct, but you are (...) (15 years ago, 11-Aug-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) Did you have any suggestions for him? I did not, other than that he does not have his paths set up correctly (which was already mentioned). I do not even have LPub 2 installed anywhere anymore. Do you? If so, maybe you could help him. I'd (...) (15 years ago, 11-Aug-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) I have a few comments here. First of all, if you're going to load a huge model in LDView, it's usually best to set its "Memory Usage" setting to Low (especially on old hardware). Secondly, as has been pointed out, LDView takes a lot longer to (...) (15 years ago, 11-Aug-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
| | | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) Well, what we are actually trying with the new LDConfig.ldr file is getting more colors into LDraw, colors people find in today’s set but not LDraw and IMHO it lowers the bar for users if the colors are consistent throughout the system. Since (...) (15 years ago, 12-Aug-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) No need for the vitriol Tore. (...) Yes but, as with all things, people come and people go. I, for example, am much more withdrawn than I was in 2004 since I'm on an operational submarine now and only have a limited amount of time in port. (...) (15 years ago, 13-Aug-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) It is the webmaster's policy that the authors submit and maintain the links to their tools and we only remove broken links. Obviously nothing hinders us to update the link for L3P at Ldraw.org but since nothing on the official page (URL) (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
