Subject:
|
Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:05:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
16960 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> That's very good news! Very recently I visited
> http://www.ldraw.org/Downloads-req-viewdownload-cid-11.html and there it reads:
> "Version: 1.3 | File size: 78.00 Kb" and links to
> http://www.hassings.dk/l3/l3p.html where it reads: "NEW Read about the v1.3
> 20010120 release NEW". Maybe time to update some pages?
It is the webmaster's policy that the authors submit and maintain the links to
their tools and we only remove broken links. Obviously nothing hinders us to
update the link for L3P at Ldraw.org but since nothing on the official page
http://www.hassings.dk/l3/l3p.html points to the beta version we have to take
into account that apparently the author considers his beta version not fit for
the public yet, though it has been released almost a year ago.
> I don't see the point in disregarding backwards compability when there's nothing
> to gain with it. I was pro skipping subfiling silver, gold and other special
> colored pattern details - but that did only affect original LDraw because of a
> tiny bug in it. We still have a couple of hundred color numbers that do not
> cause problems with older LDraw programs and utilities that don't search
> LDConfig.ldr, why on earth not use them first?
Hmm ... let's see: http://www.hassings.dk/l3/l3lab.html Current version: v1.2 -
2000 06 16.
* Last time we stuck to backwards compatibility for a no longer updated prog we
had to separate dithers colors into subfiles.
* Last time we stuck to backwards compatibility for a no longer updated prog the
PT admins had to squeeze the parts numbering into 8 digits.
* Last time we stuck to backwards compatibility for a no longer updated prog the
numbering of the new colors was bend to this scheme:
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=11937
* Last time we stuck to a no longer updated prog we ended up with three years
without any library update and some 3000 part headers checked one by one.
Welcome to 2009.
> Correct, LDraw.org Colour Definition Language Extension specs doesn't talk about
> a forbidden zone. But OTOH, has there been a decision that it's ok to use these
> incompatible color numbers?
Go and ask the LSC.
w.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) That is just so not true. (...) Well then, welcome to my reality. Viewing just a small portion of Datsville on my AMD1100, for example TOWN-10.ldr, takes 1.8 seconds in L3Lab. But several minutes in LDView - if it doesn't crash. I am (...) (15 years ago, 11-Aug-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) That's very good news! Very recently I visited (URL) and there it reads: "Version: 1.3 | File size: 78.00 Kb" and links to (URL) where it reads: "NEW Read about the v1.3 20010120 release NEW". Maybe time to update some pages? I haven't checked (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
