To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 6107
6106  |  6108
Subject: 
Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 2 May 2001 16:06:29 GMT
Viewed: 
2869 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Gyugyi wrote:

As soon as the parts library is opened up, I promise
I'll check it all into Sourceforge.org, so one can use industry-
standard tools like CVS to update parts and see what is new,
check in bug fixes (if permissions allow), record versioning
information, etc.

Paul,

I don't know if you saw earlier messages about the Part Tracker, but there
was some discussion about whether or not we could use CVS as a backend to
an automated system.  What do you think?

There are a number of features we need that (I think) CVS does not offer
'out of the box'.  These are:

1. Unofficial/Official flag.  When files are submitted, they are
unofficial.  Once they're released, they're official.  Or turn this around,
and once files are official (ie, certified), they're released.

2. Certification process.  After files are submitted, they need to be
peer-reviewed.  After they're peer-reviewed and OK'ed, they can be
auto-included in the next update cycle.

3. File-checking.  When files are submitted, they should be auto-checked
for syntactic problems.

A couple of issues with using CVS in development with the Parts Tracker
are: (remember, I've got no experience with CVS; some of these could be
ignorance)

1. NIH.  Discount this one if you want.  Or call it 'unfamiliarity with CVS
causes project to be more complicated rather than less'.
2. CVS gives us functionality that is nice to have, but not required for
the PT.

STeve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
(...) I'll go look up the discussion. I'm just getting back into the swing of things. I think CVS would be a great way of distributing the parts. There's clearly some managment tools needed to help with organizing the submissions and reviews of new (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
HeeHeee! I have great faith in Tim that one day LDraw will become an open project, but I don't think it has ever been one in the past! :) As soon as the parts library is opened up, I promise I'll check it all into Sourceforge.org, so one can use (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

60 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR