To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 6094
6093  |  6095
Subject: 
Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 1 May 2001 18:53:11 GMT
Viewed: 
2626 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney wrote:

"Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:GCnMwn.Axw@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.cad.dev, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
"Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> writes:

Give me unofficial parts, I don't care.

I don't think that unofficial parts should be published from LDraw.


Agree - unofficial means they may change - and if the change is to the origin
or orientation then users will get (even more) upset.

Disagree.

I think Chris is right.  It will be challenging to disclaim an unofficial
update in a way that nobody will get upset later.  When we do officialize
the pieces, there will be orientation changes, and different part numbers
with no forwarding addresses.  Models built on unofficial parts are likely
to break.

There's also the issue of being able to later clean up the pollution from
an unofficial update.  It would be easy to enough for people to use their
Windows Find to locate files containing the word 'unofficial', and delete
those files, but that would imply that we reviewed all the files before
releasing them, to make sure they all have the "unofficial element" line.
And reviewing all the files before an official release is something we're
trying to avoid, right?

Steve



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
HMM a minor idea. group all Unofficial parts in "Unofficial" group like "brick" and "plate" type of group. -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:p61uetc27fg7opi...4ax.com... (...) I think I see it now. As far as broken models go, we don't want that. I have had a couple of those, and that's frustrating. I got your message in this (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
"Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GCnMwn.Axw@lugnet.com... (...) Disagree. We package the parts and put a whoppin disclaimer on them. They are not official, just compiled and made easily available. We make it clear that (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

60 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR