Subject:
|
Re: LPub 4 Status
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:41:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9137 times
|
| |
|
|
> I agree. It was inconsistent. I've provided DPM, DPCM, DPMM, and the values
> specified in meta commands are scaled appropriately.
DPCM might be enough: Photoshop (which can be considered as a reference...) only
has DPI and DPCM.
Philo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) Thanks Philo! I've limited to dots per inch inch and dots per centimeter. This is nice from a formatting pespective because margins and sizes fall into smaller ranges than with inches and meters. Kevin (16 years ago, 10-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) I agree. It was inconsistent. I've provided DPM, DPCM, DPMM, and the values specified in meta commands are scaled appropriately. (16 years ago, 7-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
81 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
