Subject:
|
Re: Elian Gonzales
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Apr 2000 20:01:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1042 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > nor do I accept the basis of such an either/or determination.
>
> OK, what are the other possibilities?
>
> Two that you mention are:
>
> - "unaware" which I've just knocked out for you, you're aware now. It's also a
> form of delusional, you're deluded (by nonawareness) into thinking that it
> isn't a problem... so it's covered that way
>
> - "uncaring" which is just another form of evil.
>
> Still down to a nice either or.
What if I take the stance that to a certain degree people must want to free
themselves enough to make it happen, or trying to provide them with freedom
will do no good? How does that fit into this binary classification?
> Take it or leave it. Remember, I don't really CARE what anyone else thinks. I
> don't get validation from other people saying they approve.
You might perhaps be better served by caring more. If you care enough to
sheppard people into the light, you will have a larger voting block to help
make the world the way you want it to be.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Elian Gonzales
|
| (...) *Now* you say that but originally you said "Undoubtedly! But that's still an assumption based on preconceptions" and that is what is leading me to believe that you weren't accepting that in fact most people under communist regimes live in (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
