Subject:
|
Re: Should we be concerned?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 31 May 2003 20:28:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
186 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello wrote:
> Other than Fox and the Washington Times isn't almost all media "liberal"?
Tsk. Someone from southern california and he doesn't mention the Orange County
Register. The Long Beach paper is (was? it's been a while since I've seen it)
conservative. The Los Angeles Times is barely left of center. The New York
Times: who cares? They don't have a comics section! :-)
"Media". Hmmmm, radio. Conservative. Overwhelmingly. Magazines. Gun
magazines, car magazines, National Review, Human Events, The Economist, the
Weekly Standard, just to name a few. If you mean network television is liberal,
please say that rather than the mindless all-inclusive highly-inaccurate
"media". I mean, where do you hear these complaints about "the liberal media"?
In the media? Hmmmmmm....
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Should we be concerned?
|
| (...) Such an attack is usally groundless and proffered by a person that has no idea what the "left" is really about. The all encompassing "media" is hardly "left." Offhand, I'd say Costello has no real knowledge of "left" or "right" -- I hear a lot (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Should we be concerned?
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) I am a bit concerned, and agree with you here. I think programming has long been homogenized. However, I rarely see the pro conservative agenda being advanced. My main concern is the lack (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
